Comments on: Omaha Poker History http://www.omahapoker.com Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:02:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: james http://www.omahapoker.com/omaha-poker-101/history/comment-page-1#comment-14961 james Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:58:49 +0000 http://www.omahapoker.com/omaha-poker-101/omaha-poker-history#comment-14961 Ed, You win. You and your opponent have to use two cards in your and three on the board. The jacks become irrelevant in your example. You have kings full of fives and your opponent kings full of threes. Ed,

You win. You and your opponent have to use two cards in your and three on the board. The jacks become irrelevant in your example. You have kings full of fives and your opponent kings full of threes.

]]> By: ed http://www.omahapoker.com/omaha-poker-101/history/comment-page-1#comment-14670 ed Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:29:02 +0000 http://www.omahapoker.com/omaha-poker-101/omaha-poker-history#comment-14670 I'm holding : 55 67 my oponent is holding 33 92 the board is K K K J J do we chop? or does my pair of 5's beat his pair of 3's giving me kings full of 5's? I’m holding : 55 67
my oponent is holding 33 92

the board is K K K J J

do we chop?
or does my pair of 5′s beat his pair of 3′s giving me kings full of 5′s?

]]>